Mark Twain
Concerning The Jews
Harper's Magazine,
March, 1898
Some months ago I
published a magazine article descriptive of a remarkable scene in the Imperial
Parliament in Vienna. Since then I have received from Jews in America several
letters of inquiry. They were difficult letters to answer, for they were not
very definite. But at last I have received a definite one. It is from a lawyer,
and he really asks the questions which the other writers probably believed they
were asking. By help of this text I will do the best I can to publicly answer
this correspondent, and also the others - at the same time apologizing for
having failed to reply privately. The lawyer's letter reads as follows:
I have read 'Stirring
Times in Austria.' One point in particular is of vital import to not a few
thousand people, including myself, being a point about which I have often
wanted to address a question to some disinterested person. The show of military
force in the Austrian Parliament, which precipitated the riots, was not
introduced by any Jew. No Jew was a member of that body. No Jewish question was
involved in the Ausgleich or in the language proposition. No Jew was insulting
anybody. In short, no Jew was doing any mischief toward anybody whatsoever. In
fact, the Jews were the only ones of the nineteen different races in Austria
which did not have a party - they are absolutely non-participants.
Yet in your article you
say that in the rioting which followed, all classes of people were unanimous
only on one thing, viz., in being against the Jews. Now will you kindly tell me
why, in your judgment, the Jews have thus ever been, and are even now, in these
days of supposed intelligence, the butt of baseless, vicious animosities? I
dare say that for centuries there has been no more quiet, undisturbing, and
well-behaving citizen, as a class, than that same Jew. It seems to me that
ignorance and fanaticism cannot alone account for these horrible and unjust
persecutions.
"Tell me,
therefore, from your vantage-point of cold view, what in your mind is the
cause. Can American Jews do anything to correct it either in America or abroad?
Will it ever come to an end? Will a Jew be permitted to live honestly,
decently, and peaceably like the rest of mankind? What has become of the Golden
Rule?" I will begin by saying that if I thought myself prejudiced against
the Jew, I should hold it fairest to leave this subject to a person not
crippled in that way. But I think I have no such prejudice. A few years ago a
Jew observed to me that there was no uncourteous reference to his people in my
books, and asked how it happened. It happened because the disposition was
lacking. I am quite sure that (bar one) I have no race prejudices, and I think
I have no color prejudices nor caste prejudices nor creed prejudices. Indeed, I
know it.
I can stand any society.
All that I care to know is that a man is a human being - that is enough for me;
he can't be any worse. I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least
claim that I have no prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little
his way, on account of his not having a fair show.
All religions issue
bibles against him, and say the most injurious things about him, but we never
hear his side. We have none but the evidence for the prosecution, and yet we
have rendered the verdict. To my mind, this is irregular. It is un-English; it
is un-American; it is French. Without this precedent Dreyfus could not have
been condemned.
Of course Satan has some
kind of a case, it goes without saying. It may be a poor one, but that is
nothing; that can be said about any of us. As soon as I can get at the facts I
will undertake his rehabilitation myself, if I can find an unpolitic publisher.
It is a thing which we ought to be willing to do for any one who is under a
cloud. We may not pay him reverence, for that would be indiscreet, but we can
at least respect his talents.
A person who has for
untold centuries maintained the imposing position of spiritual head of
four-fifths of the human race, and political head of the whole of it, must be
granted the possession of executive abilities of the loftiest order. In his
large presence the other popes and politicians shrink to midges for the
microscope. I would like to see him. I would rather see him and shake him by
the tail than any other member of the European Concert.
In the present paper I
shall allow myself to use the word Jew as if it stood for both religion and
race. It is handy; and, besides, that is what the term means to the general
world. In the above letter one notes these points:
1. The Jew is a
well-behaved citizen.
2. Can ignorance and
fanaticism alone account for his unjust treatment?
3. Can Jews do anything
to improve the situation?
4. The Jews have no
party; they are non-participants.
5. Will the persecution
ever come to an end?
6. What has become of
the Golden Rule?
Point No. 1.
We must grant
proposition No. 1 for several sufficient reasons. The Jew is not a disturber of
the peace of any country. Even his enemies will concede that. He is not a
loafer, he is not a sot, he is not noisy, he is not a brawler nor a rioter, he
is not quarrelsome. In the statistics of crime his presence is conspicuously
rare - in all countries. With murder and other crimes of violence he has but
little to do: he is a stranger to the hangman. In the police court's daily long
roll of "assaults" and "drunk and disorderlies" his name
seldom appears.
That the Jewish home is
a home in the truest sense is a fact which no one will dispute. The family is
knitted together by the strongest affections; its members show each other every
due respect; and reverence for the elders is an inviolate law of the house. The
Jew is not a burden on the charities of the state nor of the city; these could
cease from their functions without affecting him.
When he is well enough,
he works; when he is incapacitated, his own people take care of him. And not in
a poor and stingy way, but with a fine and large benevolence. His race is
entitled to be called the most benevolent of all the races of men. A Jewish
beggar is not impossible, perhaps; such a thing may exist, but there are few
men that can say they have seen that spectacle. The Jew has been staged in many
uncomplimentary forms, but, so far as I know, no dramatist has done him the
injustice to stage him as a beggar. Whenever a Jew has real need to beg, his
people save him from the necessity of doing it. The charitable institutions of
the Jews are supported by Jewish money, and amply. The Jews make no noise about
it; it is done quietly; they do not nag and pester and harass us for
contributions; they give us peace, and set us an example - an example which we
have not found ourselves able to follow; for by nature we are not free givers,
and have to be patiently and persistently hunted down in the interest of the
unfortunate.
These facts are all on
the credit side of the proposition that the Jew is a good and orderly citizen.
Summed up, they certify that he is quiet, peaceable, industrious, unaddicted to
high crimes and brutal dispositions; that his family life is commendable; that
he is not a burden upon public charities; that he is not a beggar; that in
benevolence he is above the reach of competition. These are the very
quint-essentials of good citizenship. If you can add that he is as honest as
the average of his neighbors - But I think that question is affirmatively
answered by the fact that he is a successful business man.
The basis of successful
business is honesty; a business cannot thrive where the parties to it cannot trust
each other. In the matter of numbers of the Jew counts for little in the
overwhelming population of New York; but that his honesty counts for much is
guaranteed by the fact that the immense wholesale business houses of Broadway,
from the Battery to Union Square, is substantially in his hands. I suppose that
the most picturesque example in history of a trader's trust in his
fellow-trader was one where it was not Christian trusting Christian, but
Christian trusting Jew.
That Hessian Duke who
used to sell his subjects to George III. to fight George Washington with got
rich at it; and by-and-by, when the wars engendered by the French Revolution
made his throne too warm for him, he was obliged to fly the country. He was in
a hurry, and had to leave his earnings behind - $9,000,000. He had to risk the
money with some one without security. He did not select a Christian, but a Jew
- a Jew of only modest means, but of high character; a character so high that
it left him lonesome - Rothschild of Frankfort. Thirty years later, when Europe
had become quiet and safe again, the Duke came back from overseas, and the Jew
returned the loan, with interest added.
[Footnote *: Here is
another piece of picturesque history; and it reminds us that shabbiness and
dishonesty are not the monopoly of any race or creed, but are merely human:
"Congress has
passed a bill to pay $379.56 to Moses Pendergrass, of Libertyville, Missouri.
The story of the reason of this liberality is pathetically interesting, and
shows the sort of pickle that an honest man may get into who undertakes to do
an honest job of work for Uncle Sam. In 1886 Moses Pendergrass put in a bid for
the contract to carry the mail on the route from Knob Lick to Libertyville and
Coffman, thirty miles a day, from July 1, 1887, for one year. He got the
postmaster at Knob Lick to write the letter for him, and while Moses intended
that his bid should be $400, his scribe carelessly made it $4. Moses got the
contract, and did not find out about the mistake until the end of the first
quarter, when he got his first pay. When he found at what rate he was working
he was sorely cast down, and opened communication with the Post-Office
Department.
The department informed
him that he must either carry out his contract or throw it up, and that if he
threw it up his bondsmen would have to pay the government $1459.85 damages. So
Moses carried out his contract, walked thirty miles every week-day for a year,
and carried the mail, and received for his labor $4 - or, to be accurate,
$6.84; for, the route being extended after his bid was accepted, the pay was
proportionately increased. Now, after ten years, a bill was finally passed to
pay to Moses the difference between what he earned in that unlucky year and
what he received."
The Sun, which tells the
above story, says that bills were introduced in three or four Congresses for
Moses' relief, and that committees repeatedly investigated his claim. It took
six Congresses, containing in their persons the compressed virtues of
70,000,000 of people, and cautiously and carefully giving expression to those
virtues in the fear of God and the next election, eleven years to find out some
way to cheat a fellow-Christian out of about $13 on his honestly executed
contract, and out of nearly $300 due him on its enlarged terms. And they
succeeded.
During the same time
they paid out $1,000,000,000 in pensions - a third of it unearned and
undeserved. This indicates a splendid all-around competency in theft, for it
starts with farthings, and works its industries all the way up to ship-loads.
It may be possible that the Jews can beat this, but the man that bets on it is
taking chances.]
The Jew has his other
side. He has some discreditable ways, though he has not a monopoly of them,
because he cannot get entirely rid of vexatious Christian competition. We have
seen that he seldom transgresses the laws against crimes of violence. Indeed,
his dealings with courts are almost restricted to matters connected with
commerce. He has a reputation for various small forms of cheating, and for
practising oppressive usury, and for burning himself out to get the insurance,
and for arranging cunning contracts which leave him an exit but lock the other
man in, and for smart evasions which find him safe and comfortable just within
the strict letter of the law, when court and jury know very well that he has
violated the spirit of it.
He is a frequent and
faithful and capable officer in the civil service, but he is charged with an
unpatriotic disinclination to stand by the flag as a soldier - like the
Christian Quaker. Now if you offset these discreditable features by the
creditable ones summarized in a preceding paragraph beginning with the words,
"These facts are all on the credit side," and strike a balance, what
must the verdict be? This, I think: that, the merits and demerits being fairly
weighed and measured on both sides, the Christian can claim no superiority over
the Jew in the matter of good citizenship. Yet in all countries, from the dawn
of history, the Jew has been persistently and implacably hated, and with
frequency persecuted.
Point No. 2.
"Can fanaticism
alone account for this?" Years ago I used to think that it was responsible
for nearly all of it, but latterly I have come to think that this was an error.
Indeed, it is now my conviction that it is responsible for hardly any of it. In
this connection I call to mind Genesis, chapter xlvii. We have all thoughtfully
- or unthoughtfully - read the pathetic story of the years of plenty and the
years of famine in Egypt, and how Joseph, with that opportunity, made a corner
in broken hearts, and the crusts of the poor, and human liberty - a corner
whereby he took a nation's money all away, to the last penny; took a nation's
livestock all away, to the last hoof; took a nation's land away, to the last
acre; then took the nation itself, buying it for bread, man by man, woman by
woman, child by child, till all were slaves; a corner which took everything,
left nothing; a corner so stupendous that, by comparison with it, the most
gigantic corners in subsequent history are but baby things, for it dealt in
hundreds of millions of bushels, and its profits were reckonable by hundreds of
millions of dollars, and it was a disaster so crushing that its effects have
not wholly disappeared from Egypt to-day, more than three thousand years after
the event.
Is it presumable that
the eye of Egypt was upon Joseph the foreign Jew all this time? I think it
likely. Was it friendly? We must doubt it. Was Joseph establishing a character
for his race which would survive long in Egypt? and in time would his name come
to be familiarly used to express that character - like Shylock's? It is hardly
to be doubted.
Let us remember that
this was centuries before the crucifixion. I wish to come down eighteen hundred
years later and refer to a remark made by one of the Latin historians. I read
it in a translation many years ago, and it comes back to me now with force. It
was alluding to a time when people were still living who could have seen the
Savior in the flesh. Christianity was so new that the people of Rome had hardly
heard of it, and had but confused notions of what it was.
The substance of the
remark was this: Some Christians were persecuted in Rome through error, they
being "mistaken for Jews." The meaning seems plain. These pagans had
nothing against Christians, but they were quite ready to persecute Jews. For
some reason or other they hated a Jew before they even knew what a Christian
was. May I not assume, then, that the persecution of Jews is a thing which
antedates Christianity and was not born of Christianity? I think so.
What was the origin of
the feeling? When I was a boy, in the back settlements of the Mississippi
Valley, where a gracious and beautiful Sunday-school simplicity and unpracticality
prevailed, the "Yankee" (citizen of the New England States) was hated
with a splendid energy. But religion had nothing to do with it. In a trade, the
Yankee was held to be about five times the match of the Westerner. His
shrewdness, his insight, his judgment, his knowledge, his enterprise, and his
formidable cleverness in applying these forces were frankly confessed, and most
competently cursed.
In the cotton States,
after the war, the simple and ignorant negroes made the crops for the white planter
on shares. The Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied
all the negro's wants on credit, and at the end of the season was proprietor of
the negro's share of the present crop and of part of his share of the next one.
Before long, the whites detested the Jew, and it is doubtful if the negro loved
him.
The Jew is being
legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was
instituted because the Christian peasant and villager stood no chance against
his commercial abilities. He was always ready to lend money on a crop, and sell
vodka and other necessaries of life on credit while the crop was growing. When
settlement day came he owned the crop; and next year or year after he owned the
farm, like Joseph.
In the dull and ignorant
England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all
lucrative enterprises into his hands; he was the king of commerce; he was ready
to be helpful in all profitable ways; he even financed crusades for the rescue
of the Sepulchre. To wipe out his account with the nation and restore business
to its natural and incompetent channels he had to be banished the realm.
For the like reasons
Spain had to banish him four hundred years ago, and Austria about a couple of
centuries later. In all the ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail
his activities. If he entered upon a mechanical trade, the Christian had to
retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he was the best one, and he took the
business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at
something else. Since there was no way to successfully compete with him in any
vocation, the law had to step in and save the Christian from the poor-house.
Trade after trade was
taken away from the Jew by statute till practically none was left. He was
forbidden to engage in agriculture; he was forbidden to practise law; he was
forbidden to practise medicine, except among Jews; he was forbidden the
handicrafts. Even the seats of learning and the schools of science had to be
closed against this tremendous antagonist.
Still, almost bereft of
employments, he found ways to make money, even ways to get rich. Also ways to
invest his takings well, for usury was not denied him. In the hard conditions
suggested, the Jew without brains could not survive, and the Jew with brains
had to keep them in good training and well sharpened up, or starve. Ages of
restriction to the one tool which the law was not able to take from him - his
brain - have made that tool singularly competent; ages of compulsory disuse of
his hands have atrophied them, and he never uses them now.
This history has a very,
very commercial look, a most sordid and practical commercial look, the business
aspect of a Chinese cheap-labor crusade. Religious prejudices may account for
one part of it, but not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted
Catholics, but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. The
Catholics have persecuted the Protestants with bloody and awful bitterness, but
they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. Why was that?
That has the candid look of genuine religious persecution, not a trade-union
boycott in a religious disguise.
The Jews are harried and
obstructed in Austria and Germany, and lately in France; but England and
America give them an open field and yet survive. Scotland offers them an
unembarrassed field too, but there are not many takers. There are a few Jews in
Glasgow, and one in Aberdeen; but that is because they can't earn enough to get
away. The Scotch pay themselves that compliment, but it is authentic.
I feel convinced that
the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world's attitude towards the Jew;
that the reasons for it are older than that event, as suggested by Egypt's
experience and by Rome's regret for having persecuted an unknown quantity
called a Christian, under the mistaken impression that she was merely
persecuting a Jew. Merely a Jew - a skinned eel who was used to it, presumably.
I am persuaded that in
Russia, Austria, and Germany nine-tenths of the hostility to the Jew comes from
the average Christian's inability to compete successfully with the average Jew
in business - in either straight business or the questionable sort. In Berlin,
a few years ago, I read a speech which frankly urged the expulsion of the Jews
from Germany; and the agitator's reason was as frank as his proposition.
It was this: that
eighty-five per cent. of the successful lawyers of Berlin were Jews, and that
about the same percentage of the great and lucrative businesses of all sorts in
Germany were in the hands of the Jewish race! Isn't it an amazing confession?
It was but another way of saying that in a population of 48,000,000, of whom
only 500,000 were registered as Jews, eight-five per cent. of the brains and
honesty of the whole was lodged in the Jews.
I must insist upon the
honesty - it is an essential of successful business, taken by and large. Of
course it does not rule out rascals entirely, even among Christians, but it is
a good working rule, nevertheless. The speaker's figures may have been inexact,
but the motive of persecution stands out as clear as day. The man claimed that
in Berlin the banks, the newspapers, the theatres, the great mercantile,
shipping, mining, and manufacturing interests, the big army and city contracts,
the tramways, and pretty much all other properties of high value, and also the
small businesses, were in the hands of the Jews.
He said the Jew was
pushing the Christian to the wall all along the line; that it was all a Christian
could do to scrape together a living; and that the Jew must be banished, and
soon - there was no other way of saving the Christian.
Here in Vienna, last
autumn, an agitator said that all these disastrous details were true of
Austria-Hungary also; and in fierce language he demanded the expulsion of the
Jews. When politicians come out without a blush and read the baby act in this
frank way, unrebuked, it is a very good indication that they have a market back
of them, and know where to fish for votes. You note the crucial point of the
mentioned agitation; the argument is that the Christian cannot compete with the
Jew, and that hence his very bread is in peril. To human beings this is a much
more hate-inspiring thing than is any detail connected with religion.
With most people, of a
necessity, bread and meat take first rank, religion second. I am convinced that
the persecution of the Jew is not due in any large degree to religious
prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter; and in getting his money he is a very
serious obstruction to less capable neighbors who are on the same quest. I
think that that is the trouble.
In estimating worldly
values the Jew is not shallow, but deep. With precocious wisdom he found out in
the morning of time that some men worship rank, some worship heroes, some
worship power, some worship God, and that over these ideals they dispute and
cannot unite - but that they all worship money; so he made it the end and aim
of his life to get it.
He was at it in Egypt
thirty-six centuries ago; he was at it in Rome when that Christian got
persecuted by mistake for him; he has been at it ever since. The cost to him
has been heavy; his success has made the whole human race his enemy - but it
has paid, for it has brought him envy, and that is the only thing which men
will sell both soul and body to get.
He long ago observed
that a millionaire commands respect, a two-millionaire homage, a
multi-millionaire the deepest deeps of adoration. We all know that feeling; we
have seen it express itself. We have noticed that when the average man mentions
the name of a multi-millionaire he does it with that mixture in his voice of
awe and reverence and lust which burns in a Frenchman's eye when it falls on
another man's centime.
Point No. 4.
"The Jews have no
party; they are non-participants." Perhaps you have let the secret out and
given yourself away. It seems hardly a credit to the race that it is able to
say that; or to you, sir, that you can say it without remorse; more than you
should offer it as a plea against maltreatment, injustice, and oppression. Who
gives the Jew the right, who gives any race the right, to sit still, in a free
country, and let somebody else look after its safety?
The oppressed Jew was
entitled to all pity in the former times under brutal autocracies, for he was
weak and friendless, and had no way to help his case. But he has ways now, and
he has had them for a century, but I do not see that he has tried to make
serious use of them. When the Revolution set him free in France it was an act
of grace - the grace of other people; he does not appear in it as a helper. I
do not know that he helped when England set him free. Among the Twelve Sane Men
of France who have stepped forward with great Zola at their head to fight (and
win, I hope and believe ^*) the battle for the most infamously misused Jew of
modern times, do you find a great or rich or illustrious Jew helping?
In the United States he
was created free in the beginning - he did not need to help, of course. In
Austria and Germany and France he has a vote, but of what considerable use is
it to him? He doesn't seem to know how to apply it to the best effect. With all
his splendid capacities and all his fat wealth he is to-day not politically
important in any country. In America, as early as 1854, the ignorant Irish
hod-carrier, who had a spirit of his own and a way of exposing it to the
weather, made it apparent to all that he must be politically reckoned with; yet
fifteen years before that we hardly knew what an Irishman looked like.
As an intelligent force
and numerically, he has always been away down, but he has governed the country
just the same. It was because he was organized. It made his vote valuable - in
fact, essential.
You will say the Jew is
everywhere numerically feeble. That is nothing to the point - with the
Irishman's history for an object-lesson. But I am coming to your numerical
feebleness presently. In all parliamentary countries you could no doubt elect
Jews to the legislatures - and even one member in such a body is sometimes a
force which counts. How deeply have you concerned yourselves about this in
Austria, France, and Germany? Or even in America, for that matter? You remark
that the Jews were not to blame for the riots in this Reichsrath here, and you
add with satisfaction that there wasn't one in that body. That is not strictly
correct; if it were, would it not be in order for you to explain it and
apologize for it, not try to make a merit of it?
But I think that the Jew
was by no means in as large force there as he ought to have been, with his
chances. Austria opens the suffrage to him on fairly liberal terms, and it must
surely be his own fault that he is so much in the background politically. As to
your numerical weakness. I mentioned some figures awhile ago - 500,000 - as the
Jewish population of Germany. I will add some more - 6,000,000 in Russia,
5,000,000 in Austria, 250,000 in the United States. I take them from memory; I
read them in the Cyclopaedia Britannica ten or twelve years ago. Still, I am
entirely sure of them.
If those statistics are
correct, my argument is not as strong as it ought to be as concerns America,
but it still has strength. It is plenty strong enough as concerns Austria, for
ten years ago 5,000,000 was nine per cent. of the empire's population. The
Irish would govern the Kingdom of Heaven if they had a strength there like
that.
I have some suspicions;
I got them at second-hand, but they have remained with me these ten or twelve
years. When I read in the C. B. that the Jewish population of the United States
was 250,000, I wrote the editor, and explained to him that I was personally
acquainted with more Jews than that in my country, and that his figures were
without a doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. I also added that I was personally
acquainted with that many there; but that was only to raise his confidence in
me, for it was not true.
His answer miscarried,
and I never got it; but I went around talking about the matter, and people told
me they had reason to suspect that for business reasons many Jews whose
dealings were mainly with the Christians did not report themselves as Jews in
the census. It looked plausible; it looks plausible yet. Look at the city of
New York; and look at Boston, and Philadelphia, and New Orleans, and Chicago,
and Cincinnati, and San Francisco - how your race swarms in those places! - and
everywhere else in America, down to the least little village.
Read the signs on the
marts of commerce and on the shops; Goldstein (gold stone), Edelstein (precious
stone), Blumenthal (flower-vale), Rosenthal (rose-vale), Veilchenduft (violet
odor), Singvogel (song-bird), Rosenzweig (rose branch), and all the amazing
list of beautiful and enviable names which Prussia and Austria glorified you
with so long ago. It is another instance of Europe's coarse and cruel
persecution of your race; not that it was coarse and cruel to outfit it with
pretty and poetical names like those, but that it was coarse and cruel to make
it pay for them or else take such hideous and often indecent names that to-day
their owners never use them; or, if they do, only on official papers.
And it was the many, not
the few, who got the odious names, they being too poor to bribe the officials
to grant them better ones. Now why was the race renamed? I have been told that
in Prussia it was given to using fictitious names, and often changing them, so
as to beat the tax-gatherer, escape military service, and so on; and that
finally the idea was hit upon of furnishing all the inmates of a house with one
and the same surname, and then holding the house responsible right along for
those inmates, and accountable for any disappearances that might occur; it made
the Jews keep track of each other, for self-interest's sake, and saved the
government the trouble. ^*
[Footnote *: In Austria
the renaming was merely done because the Jews in some newly acquired regions
had no surnames, but were mostly named Abraham and Moses, and therefore the
tax-gatherer could not tell t'other from which, and was likely to lose his
reason over the matter. The renaming was put into the hands of the War
Department, and a charming mess the graceless young lieutenants made of it. To
them a Jew was of no sort of consequence, and they labelled the race in a way
to make the angels weep. As an example, take these two: Abraham Bellyache and
Schmul Godbedamned. - Culled from "Namens Studien," by Karl Emil
Franzos.]
If that explanation of
how the Jews of Prussia came to be renamed is correct, if it is true that they
fictitiously registered themselves to gain certain advantages, it may possibly
be true that in America they refrain from registering themselves as Jews to
fend off the damaging prejudices of the Christian customer. I have no way of
knowing whether this notion is well founded or not. There may be other and
better ways of explaining why only that poor little 250,000 of our Jews got
into the Cyclopaedia. I may, of course, be mistaken, but I am strongly of the
opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America.
Point No. 3.
"Can Jews do
anything to improve the situation?" I think so. If I may make a suggestion
without seeming to be trying to teach my grandmother how to suck eggs, I will
offer it. In our days we have learned the value of combination. We apply it everywhere
- in railway systems, in trusts, in trade unions, in Salvation Armies, in minor
politics, in major politics, in European Concerts. Whatever our strength may
be, big or little, we organize it. We have found out that that is the only way
to get the most out of it that is in it. We know the weakness of individual
sticks, and the strength of the concentrated fagot.
Suppose you try a scheme
like this, for instance. In England and America put every Jew on the
census-book as a Jew (in case you have not been doing that). Get up volunteer
regiments composed of Jews solely, and, when the drum beats, fall in and go to
the front, so as to remove the reproach that you have few Massenas among you,
and that you feed on a country but don't like to fight for it. Next, in
politics, organize you strength, band together, and deliver the casting vote
where you can, and, where you can't, compel as good terms as possible.
You huddle to yourselves
already in all countries, but you huddle to no sufficient purpose, politically
speaking. You do not seem to be organized, except for your charities. There you
are omnipotent; there you compel your due of recognition - you do not have to
beg for it. It shows what you can do when you band together for a definite
purpose. And then from America and England you can encourage your race in
Austria, France, and Germany, and materially help it.
It was a pathetic tale
that was told by a poor Jew in Galicia a fortnight ago during the riots, after
he had been raided by the Christian peasantry and despoiled of everything he
had. He said his vote was of no value to him, and he wished he could be excused
from casting it, for, indeed, casting it was a sure damage to him, since no
matter which party he voted for, the other party would come straight and take
its revenge out of him.
Nine per cent. of the
population of the empire, these Jews, and apparently they cannot put a plank
into any candidate's platform! If you will send our Irish lads over here I
think they will organize your race and change the aspect of the Reichsrath.
You seem to think that
the Jews take no hand in politics here, that they are "absolutely
non-participants." I am assured by men competent to speak that this is a
very large error, that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics all over the
empire, but that they scatter their work and their votes among the numerous
parties, and thus lose the advantages to be had by concentration. I think that
in America they scatter too, but you know more about that than I do.
Speaking of
concentration, Dr. Herzl has a clear insight into the value of that. Have you
heard of his plan? He wishes to gather the Jews of the world together in
Palestine, with a government of their own - under the suzerainty of the Sultan,
I suppose. At the Convention of Berne, last year, there were delegates from
everywhere, and the proposal was received with decided favor.
I am not the Sultan, and
I am not objecting; but if that concentration of the cunningest brains in the
world were going to be made in a free country (bar Scotland), I think it would
be politic to stop it. It will not be well to let the race find out its
strength. If the horses knew theirs, we should not ride any more.
Point No. 5.
"Will the
persecution of the Jews ever come to an end?" On the score of religion, I
think it has already come to an end. On the score of race prejudice and trade,
I have the idea that it will continue. That is, here and there in spots about
the world, where a barbarous ignorance and a sort of mere animal civilization
prevail; but I do not think that elsewhere the Jew need now stand in any fear
of being robbed and raided.
Among the high
civilizations he seems to be very comfortably situated indeed, and to have more
than his proportionate share of the prosperities going. It has that look in
Vienna. I suppose the race prejudice cannot be removed; but he can stand that;
it is no particular matter. By his make and ways he is substantially a
foreigner wherever he may be, and even the angels dislike a foreigner. I am using
this word foreigner in the German sense - stranger. Nearly all of us have an
antipathy to a stranger, even of our own nationality. We pile gripsacks in a
vacant seat to keep him from getting it; and a dog goes further, and does as a
savage would - challenges him on the spot.
The German dictionary
seems to make no distinction between a stranger and a foreigner; in its view a
stranger is a foreigner - a sound position, I think. You will always be by ways
and habits and predilections substantially strangers - foreigners - wherever
you are, and that will probably keep the race prejudice against you alive. But
you were the favorites of Heaven originally, and your manifold and unfair
prosperities convince me that you have crowded back into that snug place again.
Here is an incident that
is significant. Last week in Vienna a hailstorm struck the prodigious Central
Cemetery and made wasteful destruction there. In the Christian part of it,
according to the official figures, 621 window-panes were broken; more than 900
singing-birds were killed; five great trees and many small ones were torn to
shreds and the shreds scattered far and wide by the wind; the ornamental plants
and other decorations of the graves were ruined, and more than a hundred
tomb-lanterns shattered; and it took the cemetery's whole force of 300 laborers
more than three days to clear away the storm's wreckage. In the report occurs
this remark - and in its italics you can hear it grit its Christian teeth
". . . lediglich die israelitische Abtheilung des Friedhofes vom
Hagelwetter ganzlich verschont worden war." Not a hailstone hit the Jewish
reservation! Such nepotism makes me tired.
Point No. 6.
"What has become of
the Golden Rule?" It exists, it continues to sparkle, and is well taken
care of. It is Exhibit A in the Church's assets, and we pull it out every
Sunday and give it an airing. But you are not permitted to try to smuggle it
into this discussion, where it is irrelevant and would not feel at home. It is
strictly religious furniture, like an acolyte, or a contribution-plate, or any
of those things. It has never been intruded into business; and Jewish
persecution is not a religious passion, it is a business passion.
To conclude. - If the
statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one per cent. of the human race.
It suggests a nebulous dim puff of star-dust lost in the blaze of the Milky
Way. Properly the Jew ought hardly to be heard of; but he is heard of, has
always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and
his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness
of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of great names in
literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are
also away out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers.
He has made a marvellous
fight in this world, in all the ages; and has done it with his hands tied
behind him. He could be vain of himself, and be excused for it. The Egyptian,
the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and
splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman
followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have sprung
up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in
twilight now, or have vanished.
The Jew saw them all,
beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no
infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no
dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew;
all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his
immortality?
Source:
Mark Twain: Concerning
The Jews, Harper's Magazine, March, 1898.