Dwight
Eisenhower
State
of the Union, 1954
It is a
high honor again to present to the Congress my views on the state of the Union
and to recommend measures to advance the security, prosperity, and well-being
of the American people.
All
branches of this Government--and I venture to say both of our great
parties--can support the general objective of the recommendations I make today,
for that objective is the building of a stronger America. A nation whose every
citizen has good reason for bold hope; where effort is rewarded and prosperity
is shared; where freedom expands and peace is secure--that is what I mean by a
stronger America.
Toward
this objective a real momentum has been developed during this Administration's
first year in office. We mean to continue that momentum and to increase it. We
mean to build a better future for this nation.
Much
for which we may be thankful has happened during the past year.
First
of all we are deeply grateful that our sons no longer die on the distant
mountains of Korea. Although they are still called from our homes to military
service, they are no longer called to the field of battle.
The
nation has just completed the most prosperous year in its history. The damaging
effect of inflation on the wages, pensions, salaries and savings of us all has
been brought under control. Taxes have begun to go down. The cost of our
government has been reduced and its work proceeds with some 183,000 fewer
employees; thus the discouraging trend of modern governments toward their own limitless
expansion has in our case been reversed. The cost of armaments becomes less
oppressive as we near our defense goals; yet we are militarily stronger every
day. During the year, creation of the new Cabinet Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare symbolized the government's permanent concern with the
human problems of our citizens.
Segregation
in the armed forces and other Federal activities is on the way out. We have
also made progress toward its elimination in the District of Columbia. These
are steps in the continuing effort to eliminate inter-racial difficulty. Some
developments beyond our shores have been equally encouraging. Communist
aggression, halted in Korea, continues to meet in Indo-china the vigorous
resistance of France and the Associated States, assisted by timely aid from our
country. In West Germany, in Iran, and in other areas of the world, heartening
political victories have been won by the forces of stability and freedom.
Slowly but surely, the free world gathers strength. Meanwhile, from behind the
iron curtain, there are signs that tyranny is in trouble and reminders that its
structure is as brittle as its surface is hard.
There
has been in fact a great strategic change in the world during the past year.
That precious intangible, the initiative, is becoming ours. Our policy, not
limited to mere reaction against crises provoked by others, is free to develop
along lines of our choice not only abroad, but also at home. As a major theme
for American policy during the coming year, let our joint determination be to
hold this new initiative and to use it. We shall use this initiative to promote
three broad purposes: First, to protect the freedom of our people; second, to
maintain a strong, growing economy; third, to concern ourselves with the human
problems of the individual citizen.
Only by
active concern for each of these purposes can we be sure that we are on the
forward road to a better and a stronger America. All my recommendations today
are in furtherance of these three purposes.
I.
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
American
freedom is threatened so long as the world Communist conspiracy exists in its
present scope, power and hostility. More closely than ever before, American
freedom is interlocked with the freedom of other people. In the unity of the
free world lies our best chance to reduce the Communist threat without war. In
the task of maintaining this unity and strengthening all its parts, the
greatest responsibility falls naturally on those who, like ourselves, retain
the most freedom and strength.
We
shall, therefore, continue to advance the cause of freedom on foreign fronts.
In the
Far East, we retain our vital interest in Korea. We have negotiated with the
Republic of Korea a mutual security pact, which develops our security system
for the Pacific and which I shall promptly submit to the Senate for its consent
to ratification. We are prepared to meet any renewal of armed aggression in
Korea. We shall maintain indefinitely our bases in Okinawa. I shall ask the
Congress to authorize continued material assistance to hasten the successful
conclusion of the struggle in Indo-china. This assistance will also bring
closer the day when the Associated States may enjoy the independence already
assured by France. We shall also continue military and economic aid to the
Nationalist Government of China.
In
South Asia, profound changes are taking place in free nations which are
demonstrating their ability to progress through democratic methods. They
provide an inspiring contrast to the dictatorial methods and backward course of
events in Communist China. In these continuing efforts, the free peoples of
South Asia can be assured of the support of the United States. In the Middle
East, where tensions and serious problems exist, we will show sympathetic and impartial
friendship.
In
Western Europe our policy rests firmly on the North Atlantic Treaty. It will
remain so based as far ahead as we can see. Within its organization, the
building of a united European community, including France and Germany, is vital
to a free and self-reliant Europe. This will be promoted by the European
Defense Community which offers assurance of European security. With the coming
of unity to Western Europe, the assistance this Nation can render for the
security of Europe and the free world will be multiplied in effectiveness.
In the
Western Hemisphere we shall continue to develop harmonious and mutually
beneficial cooperation with our neighbors. Indeed, solid friendship with all
our American neighbors is a cornerstone of our entire policy.
In the
world as a whole, the United Nations, admittedly still in a state of evolution,
means much to the United States. It has given uniquely valuable services in
many places where violence threatened. It is the only real world forum where we
have the opportunity for international presentation and rebuttal. It is a place
where the nations of the world can, if they have the will, take collective
action for peace and justice. It is a place where the guilt can be squarely
assigned to those who fail to take all necessary steps to keep the peace. The
United Nations deserves our continued firm support.
FOREIGN
ASSISTANCE AND TRADE
In the
practical application of our foreign policy, we enter the field of foreign
assistance and trade. Military assistance must be continued. Technical
assistance must be maintained. Economic assistance can be reduced. However, our
economic programs in Korea and in a few other critical places of the world are
especially important, and I shall ask Congress to continue them in the next
fiscal year. The forthcoming Budget Message will propose maintenance of the
Presidential power of transferability of all assistance funds and will ask
authority to merge these funds with the regular defense funds. It will also
propose that the Secretary of Defense have primary responsibility for the
administration of foreign military assistance in accordance with the policy
guidance of the Secretary of State.
The
fact that we can now reduce our foreign economic assistance in many areas is
gratifying evidence that its objectives are being achieved. By continuing to
surpass her prewar levels of economic activity, Western Europe gains
self-reliance. Thus our relationship enters a new phase which can bring results
beneficial to our taxpayers and our allies alike, if still another step is
taken.
This
step is the creation of a healthier and freer system of trade and payments
within the free world--a system in which our allies can earn their own way and
our own economy can continue to flourish. The free world can no longer afford
the kinds of arbitrary restraints on trade that have continued ever since the
war. On this problem I shall submit to the Congress detailed recommendations,
after our Joint Commission on Foreign Economic Policy has made its report.
ATOMIC
ENERGY PROPOSAL
As we
maintain our military strength during the coming year and draw closer the bonds
with our allies, we shall be in an improved position to discuss outstanding
issues with the Soviet Union. Indeed we shall be glad to do so whenever there
is a reasonable prospect of constructive results. In this spirit the atomic
energy proposals of the United States were recently presented to the United
Nations General Assembly. A truly constructive Soviet reaction will make
possible a new start toward an era of peace, and away from the fatal road
toward atomic war.
DEFENSE
Since
our hope is peace, we owe ourselves and the world a candid explanation of the
military measures we are taking to make that peace secure. As we enter this new
year, our military power continues to grow. This power is for our own defense
and to deter aggression. We shall not be aggressors, but we and our allies have
and will maintain a massive capability to strike back. Here are some of the
considerations in our defense planning:
First,
while determined to use atomic power to serve the usages of peace, we take into
full account our great and growing number of nuclear weapons and the most
effective means of using them against an aggressor if they are needed to
preserve our freedom. Our defense will be stronger if, under appropriate
security safeguards, we share with our allies certain knowledge of the tactical
use of our nuclear weapons. I urge the Congress to provide the needed
authority.
Second,
the usefulness of these new weapons creates new relationships between men and
materials. These new relationships permit economies in the use of men as we
build forces suited to our situation in the world today. As will be seen from
the Budget Message on January 21, the airpower of our Navy and Air Force is
receiving heavy emphasis.
Third,
our armed forces must regain maximum mobility of action. Our strategic reserves
must be centrally placed and readily deployable to meet sudden aggression
against ourselves and our allies.
Fourth,
our defense must rest on trained manpower and its most economical and mobile
use. A professional corps is the heart of any security organization. It is
necessarily the teacher and leader of those who serve temporarily in the
discharge of the obligation to help defend the Republic. Pay alone will not
retain in the career service of our armed forces the necessary numbers of
long-term personnel. I strongly urge, therefore, a more generous use of other
benefits important to service morale. Among these are more adequate living
quarters and family housing units and medical care for dependents.
Studies
of military manpower have just been completed by the National Security Training
Commission and a Committee appointed by the Director of the Office of Defense
Mobilization. Evident weaknesses exist in the state of readiness and
organization of our reserve forces. Measures to correct these weaknesses will
be later submitted to the Congress.
Fifth,
the ability to convert swiftly from partial to all-out mobilization is imperative
to our security. For the first time, mobilization officials know what the
requirements are for 1,000 major items needed for military uses. These data,
now being related to civilian requirements and our supply potential, will show
us the gaps in our mobilization base. Thus we shall have more realistic
plant-expansion and stockpiling goals. We shall speed their attainment. This
Nation is at last to have an up-to-date mobilization base--the foundation of a
sound defense program.
Another
part of this foundation is, of course, our continental transport system. Some
of our vital heavy materials come increasingly from Canada. Indeed our
relations with Canada, happily always close, involve more and more the
unbreakable ties of strategic interdependence. Both nations now need the St.
Lawrence Seaway for security as well as for economic reasons. I urge the
Congress promptly to approve our participation in its construction.
Sixth,
military and non-military measures for continental defense must be and are being
strengthened. In the current fiscal year we are allocating to these purposes an
increasing portion of our effort, and in the next fiscal year we shall spend
nearly a billion dollars more for them than in 1953.
An
indispensable part of our continental security is our civil defense effort.
This will succeed only as we have the complete cooperation of State Governors,
Mayors, and voluntary citizen groups. With their help we can advance a
cooperative program which, if an attack should come, would save many lives and
lessen destruction.
The
defense program recommended in the 1955 Budget is consistent with all of the
considerations which I have just discussed. It is based on a new military
program unanimously recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and approved by me
following consideration by the National Security Council. This new program will
make and keep America strong in an age of peril. Nothing should bar its
attainment.
The
international and defense policies which I have outlined will enable us to negotiate
from a position of strength as we hold our resolute course toward a peaceful
world. We now turn to matters which are normally characterized as domestic,
well realizing that what we do abroad affects every problem at home--from the
amount of taxes to our very state of mind.
INTERNAL
SECURITY
Under
the standards established for the new employee security program, more than
2,200 employees have been separated from the Federal government. Our national
security demands that the investigation of new employees and the evaluation of
derogatory information respecting present employees be expedited and concluded
at the earliest possible date. I shall recommend that the Congress provide
additional funds where necessary to speed these important procedures.
From
the special employment standards of the Federal government I turn now to a
matter relating to American citizenship. The subversive character of the
Communist Party in the United States has been clearly demonstrated in many
ways, including court proceedings. We should recognize by law a fact that is
plain to all thoughtful citizens--that we are dealing here with actions akin to
treason--that when a citizen knowingly participates in the Communist conspiracy
he no longer holds allegiance to the United States.
I
recommend that Congress enact legislation to provide that a citizen of the
United States who is convicted in the courts of hereafter conspiring to
advocate the overthrow of this government by force or violence be treated as
having, by such act, renounced his allegiance to the United States and
forfeited his United States citizenship.
In
addition, the Attorney General will soon appear before your Committees to
present his recommendations for needed additional legal weapons with which to
combat subversion in our country and to deal with the question of claimed
immunity.
II.
STRONG ECONOMY
I turn
now to the second great purpose of our government: Along with the protection of
freedom, the maintenance of a strong and growing economy.
The
American economy is one of the wonders of the world. It undergirds our
international position, our military security, and the standard of living of
every citizen. This Administration is determined to keep our economy strong and
to keep it growing. At this moment we are in transition from a wartime to a
peacetime economy. I am confident that we can complete this transition without
serious interruption in our economic growth. But we shall not leave this vital
matter to chance. Economic preparedness is fully as important to the nation as
military preparedness.
Subsequent
special messages and the economic report on January 28 will set forth plans of
the Administration and its recommendations for Congressional action. These will
include flexible credit and debt management policies; tax measures to stimulate
consumer and business spending; suitable lending, guaranteeing, insuring, and
grant-in-aid activities; strengthened old-age and unemployment insurance
measures; improved agricultural programs; public-works plans laid well in
advance; enlarged opportunities for international trade and investment. This
mere enumeration of these subjects implies the vast amount of study,
coordination, and planning, to say nothing of authorizing legislation, that
altogether make our economic preparedness complete.
If new
conditions arise that require additional administrative or legislative action,
the Administration will still be ready. A government always ready, as this is,
to take well-timed and vigorous action, and a business community willing, as
ours is, to plan boldly and with confidence, can between them develop a climate
assuring steady economic growth.
THE
BUDGET
I shall
submit to the Congress on January 21 the first budget prepared by this
Administration, for the period July 1, 1954, through June 1955.
This
budget is adequate to the current needs of the government. It recognizes that a
Federal budget should be a stabilizing factor in the economy. Its tax and
expenditure programs will foster individual initiative and economic growth. Pending
the transmittal of my Budget Message, I shall mention here only a few points
about our budgetary situation. First, one of our initial acts was to revise,
with the cooperation of the Congress, the Budget prepared before this
Administration took office. Requests for new appropriations were greatly
reduced. In addition, the spending level provided in that Budget for the
current fiscal year has been reduced by about $7,000,000,000. In the next
fiscal year we estimate a further reduction in expenditures of more than
$5,000,000,000. This will reduce the spending level over the two fiscal years
by more than $12,000,000,000. We are also reducing further our requests for new
appropriations.
Second,
despite the substantial loss of revenue in the coming fiscal year, resulting
from tax reductions now in effect and tax adjustments which I shall propose,
our reduced spending will move the new budget closer to a balance.
Third,
by keeping new appropriation requests below estimated revenues, we continue to
reduce the tremendous accumulation of unfinanced obligations incurred by the
Government under past appropriations.
Fourth,
until those claims on our Government's revenues are further reduced, the growth
in the public debt cannot be entirely stopped. Because of this--because the
government's bills have to be paid every month, while the tax money to pay them
comes in with great unevenness within the fiscal year--and because of the need
for flexibility to manage this enormous debt, I find it necessary to renew my
request for an increase in the statutory debt limit.
TAXES
The new
budget provides for a lower level of taxation than has prevailed in preceding
years. Six days ago individual income taxes were reduced and the excess profits
tax expired. These tax reductions are justified only because of the substantial
reductions we already have made and are making in governmental expenditures. As
additional reductions in expenditures are brought gradually but surely into
sight, further reductions in taxes can and will be made. When budget savings
and sound governmental financing are assured, tax burdens should be reduced so
that taxpayers may spend their own money in their own way. While we are moving
toward lower levels of taxation we must thoroughly revise our whole tax system.
The groundwork for this revision has already been laid by the Committee on Ways
and Means of the House of Representatives, in close consultation with the
Department of the Treasury. We should now remove the more glaring tax
inequities, particularly on small taxpayers; reduce restraints on the growth of
small business; and make other changes that will encourage initiative,
enterprise and production. Twenty-five recommendations toward these ends will
be contained in my budget message.
Without
attempting to summarize these manifold reforms, I can here illustrate their
tendency. For example, we propose more liberal tax treatment for dependent
children who work, for widows or widowers with dependent children, and for
medical expenses.
For the
business that wants to expand or modernize its plant, we propose liberalized
tax treatment of depreciation, research and development expenses, and retained
earnings.
Because
of the present need for revenue the corporation income tax should be kept at
the current rate of 52% for another year, and the excise taxes scheduled to be
reduced on April first, including those on liquor, tobacco, gasoline and
automobiles, should be continued at present rates.
Immediate
extension of the Renegotiation Act of 1951 is also needed to eliminate
excessive profits and to prevent waste of public funds in the purchase of
defense materials.
AGRICULTURE
The
well being of our 160 million people demands a stable and prosperous
agriculture. Conversely, every farmer knows he cannot prosper unless all
America prospers. As we seek to promote increases in our standard of living, we
must be sure that the farmer fairly shares in that increase. Therefore, a farm
program promoting stability and prosperity in all elements of our agriculture
is urgently needed.
Agricultural
laws now in effect successfully accomplished their wartime purpose of
encouraging maximum production of many crops. Today, production of these crops
at such levels far exceeds present demand. Yet the laws encouraging such
production are still in effect. The storage facilities of the Commodity Credit
Corporation bulge with surplus stocks of dairy products, wheat, cotton, corn,
and certain vegetable oils; and the Corporation's presently authorized
borrowing authority--$6,750,000,000--is nearly exhausted. Some products, priced
out of domestic markets, and others, priced out of world markets, have piled up
in government hands. In a world in which millions of people are hungry,
destruction of food would, of course, be unconscionable. Yet surplus stocks
continue to threaten the market and in spite of the acreage controls authorized
by present law, surpluses will continue to accumulate. We confront two
alternatives. The first is to impose still greater acreage reductions for some
crops and apply rigid Federal controls over the use of the diverted acres. This
will regiment the production of every basic agricultural crop. It will place
every producer of those crops under the domination and control of the Federal
government in Washington. This alternative is contrary to the fundamental
interests, not only of the farmer, but of the Nation as a whole. Nor is it a
real solution to the problem facing us.
The
second alternative is to permit the market price for these agricultural
products gradually to have a greater influence on the planning of production by
farmers, while continuing the assistance of the government. This is the sound
approach. To make it effective, surpluses existing when the new program begins
must be insulated from the normal channels of trade for special uses. These
uses would include school lunch programs, disaster relief, emergency assistance
to foreign friends, and of particular importance the stockpiling of reserves
for a national emergency. Building on the agricultural laws of 1948 and 1949,
we should establish a price support program with enough flexibility to attract
the production of needed supplies of essential commodities and to stimulate the
consumption of those commodities that are flooding American markets. Transition
to modernized parity must be accomplished gradually. In no case should there be
an abrupt downward change in the dollar level or in the percentage level of
price supports.
Next
Monday I shall transmit to the Congress my detailed recommendations embodying this
approach. They have been developed through the cooperation of innumerable
individuals vitally interested in agriculture. My special message on Monday
will briefly describe the consultative and advisory processes to which this
whole program has been subjected during the past ten months. I have chosen this
farm program because it will build markets, protect the consumers' food supply,
and move food into consumption instead of into storage. It is a program that
will remove the threat to the farmer of these overhanging surpluses, a program,
also, that will stimulate production when a commodity is scarce and encourage
consumption when nature is bountiful. Moreover, it will promote the individual
freedom, responsibility, and initiative which distinguish American agriculture.
And, by helping our agriculture achieve full parity in the market, it promises
our farmers a higher and steadier financial return over the years than any
alternative plan.
CONSERVATION
Part of
our Nation's precious heritage is its natural resources. It is the common
responsibility of Federal, state, and local governments to improve and develop
them, always working in the closest harmony and partnership.
All
Federal conservation and resource development projects are being reappraised.
Sound projects now under way will be continued. New projects in which the
Federal Government has a part must be economically sound, with local sharing of
cost wherever appropriate and feasible. In the next fiscal year work will be
started on twenty-three projects that meet these standards. The Federal
Government will continue to construct and operate economically sound flood
control, power, irrigation and water supply projects wherever these projects
are beyond the capacity of local initiative, public or private, and consistent
with the needs of the whole Nation.
Our
conservation program will also take into account the important role played by
farmers in protecting our soil resources. I recommend enactment of legislation
to strengthen agricultural conservation and upstream flood prevention work, and
to achieve a better balance with major flood control structures in the
down-stream areas.
Recommendations
will be made from time to time for the adoption of:
A
uniform and consistent water resources policy;
A revised
public lands policy; and
A sound
program for safeguarding the domestic production
of
critical and strategic metals and minerals.
In
addition we shall continue to protect and improve our national forests, parks,
monuments and other natural and historic sites, as well as our fishery and
wildlife resources. I hope that pending legislation to improve the conservation
and management of publicly-owned grazing lands in national forests will soon be
approved by the Congress.
NATIONAL
HIGHWAYS
To
protect the vital interest of every citizen in a safe and adequate highway
system, the Federal Government is continuing its central role in the Federal
Aid Highway Program. So that maximum progress can be made to overcome present
inadequacies in the Interstate Highway System, we must continue the Federal
gasoline tax at two cents per gallon. This will require cancellation of the 1/2
cent decrease which otherwise will become effective April 1st, and will
maintain revenues so that an expanded highway program can be undertaken.
When
the Commission on Intergovernmental Relations completes its study of the
present system of financing highway construction, I shall promptly submit it
for consideration by the Congress and the governors of the states. POST OFFICE
It is
apparent that the substantial savings already made, and to be made, by the Post
Office Department cannot eliminate the postal deficit. I recommend, therefore,
that the Congress approve the bill now pending in the House of Representatives
providing for the adjustment of certain postal rates. To handle the long term
aspects of this, I also recommend that the Congress create a permanent
commission to establish fair and reasonable postal rates from time to time in
the future.
III.
HUMAN PROBLEMS
Along
with the protection of freedom and maintenance of a strong and growing economy,
this Administration recognizes a third great purpose of government: concern for
the human problems of our citizens. In a modern industrial society, banishment
of destitution and cushioning the shock of personal disaster on the individual
are proper concerns of all levels of government, including the federal
government. This is especially true where remedy and prevention alike are
beyond the individual's capacity.
LABOR
AND WELFARE
Of the
many problems in this area, those I shall first discuss are of particular
concern to the members of our great labor force, who with their heads, hearts
and hands produce so much of the wealth of our country.
Protection
against the hazards of temporary unemployment should be extended to some 6 1/2
millions of workers, including civilian Federal workers, who now lack this
safeguard. Moreover, the Secretary of Labor is making available to the states
studies and recommendations in the fields of weekly benefits, periods of
protection and extension of coverage. The Economic Report will consider the
related matter of minimum wages and their coverage. The Labor Management
Relations Act of 1947 is basically a sound law. However, six years of
experience have revealed that in some respects it can be improved. On January
11, I shall forward to the Congress suggestions for changes designed to
reinforce the basic objectives of the Act.
Our
basic social security program, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance system, to
which individuals contribute during their productive years and receive benefits
based on previous earnings, is designed to shield them from destitution. Last
year I recommended extension of the social insurance system to include more
than 10,000,000 additional persons. I ask that this extension soon be
accomplished. This and other major improvements in the insurance system will
bring substantial benefit increases and broaden the membership of the insurance
system, thus diminishing the need for Federal grants-in-aid for such purposes.
A new formula will therefore be proposed, permitting progressive reduction in
such grants as the need for them declines.
Federal
grant-in-aid welfare programs, now based on widely varying formulas, should be
simplified. Concrete proposals on fourteen of them will be suggested to the
appropriate Committees. The program for rehabilitation of the disabled
especially needs strengthening. Through special vocational training, this
program presently returns each year some 60,000 handicapped individuals to
productive work. Far more disabled people can be saved each year from idleness
and dependence if this program is gradually increased. My more detailed
recommendations on this and the other social insurance problems I have
mentioned will be sent to the Congress on January 14th.
HEALTH
I am
flatly opposed to the socialization of medicine. The great need for hospital
and medical services can best be met by the initiative of private plans. But it
is unfortunately a fact that medical costs are rising and already impose severe
hardships on many families. The Federal Government can do many helpful things
and still carefully avoid the socialization of medicine. The Federal Government
should encourage medical research in its battle with such mortal diseases as
cancer and heart ailments, and should continue to help the states in their
health and rehabilitation programs. The present Hospital Survey and
Construction Act should be broadened in order to assist in the development of
adequate facilities for the chronically ill, and to encourage the construction
of diagnostic centers, rehabilitation facilities, and nursing homes. The war on
disease also needs a better working relationship between Government and private
initiative. Private and non-profit hospital and medical insurance plans are
already in the field, soundly based on the experience and initiative of the
people in their various communities.
A
limited Government reinsurance service would permit the private and non-profit
insurance companies to offer broader protection to more of the many families
which want and should have it. On January 18 I shall forward to the Congress a
special message presenting this Administration's health program in its detail.
EDUCATION
Youth--our
greatest resource--is being seriously neglected in a vital respect. The nation
as a whole is not preparing teachers or building schools fast enough to keep up
with the increase in our population.
The
preparation of teachers as, indeed, the control and direction of public education
policy, is a state and local responsibility. However, the Federal Government
should stand ready to assist states which demonstrably cannot provide
sufficient school buildings. In order to appraise the needs, I hope that this
year a conference on education will be held in each state, culminating in a
national conference. From these conferences on education, every level of
government--from the Federal Government to each local school board--should gain
the information with which to attack this serious problem.
HOUSING
The
details of a program to enlarge and improve the opportunities for our people to
acquire good homes will be presented to the Congress by special message on
January 25. This program will include:
Modernization
of the home mortgage insurance program of the Federal Government;
Redirection
of the present system of loans and grants-in-aid to cities for slum clearance
and redevelopment;
Extension
of the advantages of insured lending to private credit engaged in this task of
rehabilitating obsolete neighborhoods;
Insurance
of long-term, mortgage loans, with small down payment for low-income families;
and, until alternative programs prove more effective,
Continuation
of the public housing program adopted in the Housing Act of 1949.
If the
individual, the community, the State and federal governments will alike apply
themselves, every American family can have a decent home.
VETERANS
ADMINISTRATION The internal reorganization of the Veterans Administration is
proceeding with my full approval. When completed, it will afford a single
agency whose services, including medical facilities, will be better adapted to
the needs of those 20,000,000 veterans to whom this Nation owes so much.
SUFFRAGE
My few
remaining recommendations all relate to a basic right of our citizens--that of
being represented in the decisions of the government.
I hope
that the States will cooperate with the Congress in adopting uniform standards
in their voting laws that will make it possible for our citizens in the armed
forces overseas to vote. In the District of Columbia the time is long overdue
for granting national suffrage to its citizens and also applying the principle
of local self-government to the Nation's Capital. I urge the Congress to move
promptly in this direction and also to revise District revenue measures to
provide needed public works improvements.
The
people of Hawaii are ready for statehood. I renew my request for this
legislation in order that Hawaii may elect its State officials and its
representatives in Washington along with the rest of the country this fall.
For
years our citizens between the ages of 18 and 21 have, in time of peril, been
summoned to fight for America. They should participate in the political process
that produces this fateful summons. I urge Congress to propose to the States a
constitutional amendment permitting citizens to vote when they reach the age of
18.
CONCLUSION
I want
to add one final word about the general purport of these many recommendations.
Our
government's powers are wisely limited by the Constitution; but quite apart
from those limitations, there are things which no government can do or should
try to do. A government can strive, as ours is striving, to maintain an
economic system whose doors are open to enterprise and ambition--those personal
qualities on which economic growth largely depends. But enterprise and ambition
are qualities which no government can supply. Fortunately no American
government need concern itself on this score; our people have these qualities in
good measure.
A
government can sincerely strive for peace, as ours is striving, and ask its
people to make sacrifices for the sake of peace. But no government can place
peace in the hearts of foreign rulers. It is our duty then to ourselves and to
freedom itself to remain strong in all those ways--spiritual, economic,
military--that will give us maximum safety against the possibility of
aggressive action by others.
No
government can inoculate its people against the fatal materialism that plagues
our age. Happily, our people, though blessed with more material goods than any
people in history, have always reserved their first allegiance to the kingdom
of the spirit, which is the true source of that freedom we value above all
material things.
But a
government can try, as ours tries, to sense the deepest aspirations of the
people, and to express them in political action at home and abroad. So long as
action and aspiration humbly and earnestly seek favor in the sight of the
Almighty, there is no end to America's forward road; there is no obstacle on it
she will not surmount in her march toward a lasting peace in a free and
prosperous world.